According to the Daily Star, the Kosmer
Plan is done. To paraphrase Mark Twain, those reports of its demise
may have been exaggerated.
Here's what happened. There was no
plan to vote on, or officially launch, any part of the plan at the
regular Board meeting on Wednesday. Since it is a time-sensitive
plan, this would seriously delay any kind of implementation. I moved
that we suspend the rules in order to consider a Resolution putting
the plan into action. All but one Representative voted to suspend
the rules (both the rule requiring any Resolutions to be available
for review three days before the meeting, and the rule requiring any
Resolution to come from a Board committee), which I took as a good
sign. This meant that we were ready and willing to debate the plan.
The Resolution simply put the plan as
written into action. Opposition seemed to focus on the difficulty of
individual pieces of the plan – negotiating successfully with the
CSEA, creating a poll that could produce reliable results, and then
getting the state legislature to approve our 0.25% sales tax
increase.
It's true that any one of these steps
would be very difficult. That is not, in my opinion, a reason to
abandon the effort altogether. And there are reasons to think that
it might be successful.
The CSEA should be motivated to
cooperate on a plan that would keep the Manor in public hands; they
will no longer be able to represent any of the Manor staff once it's
sold to a private operator. They have already given some indication
of their willingness to talk about it.
Organizations do polls all the time,
and we have many experts available to help us word the questions and
design the system that would produce a reliable result.
And it is true that Senator Seward has
said that he would not support – nor introduce into the Senate –
a bill supporting our tax increase this session. But we've all heard
of politicians who were 'for it before they were against it,' or
vice-versa, and five months is a very long time in the political
world. And it's also true that no sales tax increase has been
approved by the legislature in five years. But it's also true that
never before has a request for a sales tax increase been sent to
Albany by a county which has renegotiated a CSEA contract and
shown that a vast majority of its citizens support it. As John
Kosmer said at the meeting, “That would be state-wide headlines.”
So
it's difficult, but not impossible. The County Board, by a
relatively slim margin, has rejected it. But the first step –
renegotiating the CSEA contract – can be initiated by the union
itself. If they are interested in pursing a plan like this, and can
assemble a proposal in time – a proposal which would only go into
effect if and when the County suspended its search for buyers – the
plan could rise again, because at that point there would no doubt be renewed interest in the poll and the sales tax increase.
There's
a difference between 'dead' and 'mostly dead.' The CSEA still has a chance
to play Miracle Max, taking the initiative the County Board has chosen not to take.
No comments:
Post a Comment