Remember - blog posts migrate downward, so the most recent post is at the top; the oldest at the bottom.

Wednesday, September 18, 2019

Life on the Board VIII - Miscellaneous 1

Some odds and ends while I have a moment (just got back from a week and a half away) -

Purchasing: About five years ago, or so, we began the process of outsourcing our purchasing management to Onondaga County, based on a relationship that a one-term Board member had with somebody in that organization. It's been a very, very long and difficult transition which has only really settled in during the last year or so.

Onondaga County (including the City of Syracuse) has a pretty massive purchasing system, and had never collaborated with a County before. We pay them $30,000/year for the service, which is about 1/3 of what it would cost us to create one position here in Otsego County. Before all this, each Department pretty much did their own purchasing (there was a half-time clerk in the Personnel office who did it for a while, but that didn't work out). The transition took so long because change is hard, and because Departments didn't like giving up autonomy, and because Onondaga County took some time to learn how to integrate us into their pretty well-oiled machine. It didn't help that the Onondaga County Purchasing Director left his position about a year into the collaboration, to work for NYS.

However, all things considered, everyone's been working hard to make this work, and Andrew Trombley, the new Onondaga County Purchasing Director, has been very responsive. As you may know, there are a lot of restrictions on municipal purchasing, to ensure fairness with the public's money and to restrict corruption, and when done right, purchasing is just awash in bureaucracy and takes forever. But there's a great advantage to doing it right, and it's usually worth the wait. We haven't heard about any real problems in this area for over a year.

Vehicles: Otsego County uses a lot of vehicles, and most of them by far are used by DSS: caseworkers are expected to be able to access any home in the county if necessary, transport out-of-county for a lot of reasons, etc. DSS has had a transportation coordinator for a long time because of this.

General and routine maintenance was done by the Highway Department until staff cuts during the economic downturn left Highway with half the staff they had ten years earlier, and no time to work on County cars.

A few years ago the Public Works Committee started looking at outsourcing our vehicle purchases and maintenance. I believe that there were two (three?) proposals, and we chose Enterprise. They lease us cars on a schedule, cycling them in and out on a four-year rotation. The best estimates they and the Treasurer can provide suggest that we'll save money. We've been doing this for about a year or so, and so far, so good. We have control over whether we keep the car (extend the lease) or not, which is a good thing: Enterprise's schedule doesn't really take into account how the cars are used. There's a hazmat truck that Emergency Services uses for specific situations. It's five years old, so Enterprise wanted us to replace it – but it's only got 16,000 miles on it. In addition, DSS – which has been making decisions about cars for decades – is requesting that a few of their cars be kept another year or so, for a variety of reasons.

Everyone agrees that we won't know if this whole system is cost-effective until a whole four-year leasing cycle is over.

AIM payments: I am not familiar with AIM payments (Aid and Incentives to Municipalities), mostly because it is State funding to cities, towns and villages for them to do with as they see fit. However, this year, there's a new way to pay for them:  County sales-tax payments from the State will be reduced by the amount of the AIM payment totals within each County. In other words, the State no longer has to pay AIM – the County does.

The justification here, such as it is, is that the new Internet sales tax payments will make up the difference. We'll see; I'm betting not. This is generally seen by counties as a very bad thing.

Some other NYS initiatives that will cost the County money – and for which the state has provided some compensatory funding :
  • Early voting: It costs more than I realized to run an election, and when you keep polling places open for over a week (October 26 through November 3 this year) before the regular Election Day, it's going to cost a whole lot more. Early voting in Otsego County will only be available at the Board of Elections office in the Meadows County Office Building, but will probably be expanded in future years.
  • Raise the Age: This initiative moves the age of adult responsibility from 16 to 17 (October 1, 2018) and then to 18 (October 1, 2019). So as of next week, individuals charged with a crime who are 18 and younger will be treated as minors, not adults, by the court system. The big cost here is if someone who is 18 or under needs to be incarcerated. This is rare in the world of minors convicted of a crime, but by raising the age, the possibility increases.  Of course, Probation and DSS, and others, will now be taking on caseloads of 16, 17 and !8 year olds in a variety of their programs.
  • Court of First Appearance (CAFA) and cashless bail – and other justice system reforms – I would check with members of the Public Safety Committee for more details.
And, finally, Otsego County is, obviously, part of the Susquehanna River watershed, since we boast one of the sources of the river, Lake Otsego. Counties in this watershed, in NY, PA and MD, are members of (I cannot for the life of me remember the name of the organization), and are responsible for a certain level of water quality reaching the Chesapeake Bay. The Otsego County Soil and Water District does a lot of work in this area, including buffer tree plantings and environmental education in the agricultural sector (fertilizer runoff and sediment are the biggest problems).

No comments:

Post a Comment