Lots happened
yesterday.
It wasn't a
surprise, as three of the most interesting and influential Committees
met, all in the same room, one after another: Strategic Plan
Implementation Committee at 8:30, Administration at 10:00, Budget at
2:00 (scheduled for 1:00, but Admin went on a little long...). I am
on all three, so it was a long day.
The StratPlan and
Budget Committees' purpose are clearly indicated in their names;
Admin is like the Ways and Means Committee of the County, providing
general oversight and approval for most actions to be considered by
the full Board (it is also the policy-making arm of County
government).
A quick dip into
each meeting, to pull out one thing of consequence. The Strategic
Plan committee is taking the Plan and moving it into the
implementation phase, mostly by prioritizing issues and sending them
off to the proper committees. However, yesterday the Committee
decided to keep the issue of the County Manager and do some research
into how to proceed, including inviting comment from officials
working in similar counties. This is good news, as it is the first
actual action on the subject, other than the fact that the Salary
Study will include a slot for this position.
The Admin Committee
has a widely-ranging agenda each month, and if you can only attend
one meeting a month, this is the one to go to. It's as close to the
place “where the sausage gets made” as any, although “the
sausage” tends to get made, to at least some extent, behind closed
doors. Transparency is a topic I hope I can explore in an upcoming
post.
At any rate, the
Admin Committee, at my request, had a conversation with County
Attorney Ellen Coccoma about a series of suits that a number of other
NY counties are bringing against pharmaceutical corporations
regarding the opiod epidemic. New York counties are to a great
extent responsible for public health, mental health and addiction
services, so the cost to the county in dollars (not to mention the
human cost) has been significant.
There has clearly
been wrongdoing on the part of the pharmas, and they can clearly be
faulted for a large part of the problem. The question is, can their
culpability be articulated in the lawsuits in such a way that they
are held legally responsible? That is still to be seen. There is
some similarity to the lawsuits that the states brought against the
tobacco companies all those years ago, although in those suits,
victims were harmed while using the product for its intended purpose,
whereas in the case of opiods, they were misued. However, the
pharmas have cheerfully assisted victims to misuse their products for
decades. The question for the Admin Committee was whether we want to
consider joining the suits. Mrs. Coccoma will contact the law firm
that is leading the initiative, and ask them to come and answer our
questions.
And finally,
Budget. I went into the meeting with two items to add to the budget
before we even began: the M&C raises, and the financial
partnership with the Susquehanna Animal Shelter. Long story short,
the SAS request will go to the Public Safety Committee, who will find
a department budget – perhaps the Sheriff – to put it in. And
Len Carson, another Rep from Oneonta, along with Treasurer Dan
Crowell, have developed a model for an M&C raise, costing
somewhere around $150,000, which, although just a start toward
parity, is a start. We'll shepherd the raise through Budget
Committee and the Board. Count on it.
No comments:
Post a Comment